-Floor plans are aligned in the center
-elevations are oriented based on the plan
-Sections are placed beside elevations (would it be a problem if my sections are 'perspective sections?' )
I'm still missing few key elements but what do you think? does it look confusing?
A problem with this lay out is its 1:50 .. and it fits the entire A0 page... do you think its too crunched up together?1. should i enlarge it to 1:25 (although it wont fit a long strip of A0, Ill need to put them in 2x2 A0)
2. or, I can just put each plan, elevations, sections i
2. or, I can just put each plan, elevations, sections i
n A0
please let me know what you guys think about it..
please let me know what you guys think about it..
It looks interesting but we should be able to read elevations and sections properly, so i advice you, when needed, to turn them 45 or 90 degrees, by adding one or more 45* line and thus keeping the constructions lines.
ReplyDeleteI would then enlarge to 1:25, which requires more details of course!, and align several A0 horizontally.
Maybe you could align the plans horizontally, spread them over several connected A0 and unfold the elevations (north-west-south-east) and sections. In this could also be integrated the site plan (and details drawings), to start from a larger context to the details, controlling and visually representing the change of scale.
Perspective sections are greatly encouraged!!