-Floor plans are aligned in the center
-elevations are oriented based on the plan
-Sections are placed beside elevations (would it be a problem if my sections are 'perspective sections?' )
I'm still missing few key elements but what do you think? does it look confusing?
A problem with this lay out is its 1:50 .. and it fits the entire A0 page... do you think its too crunched up together?1. should i enlarge it to 1:25 (although it wont fit a long strip of A0, Ill need to put them in 2x2 A0)
2. or, I can just put each plan, elevations, sections i
2. or, I can just put each plan, elevations, sections i
n A0
please let me know what you guys think about it..
please let me know what you guys think about it..
1 comment:
It looks interesting but we should be able to read elevations and sections properly, so i advice you, when needed, to turn them 45 or 90 degrees, by adding one or more 45* line and thus keeping the constructions lines.
I would then enlarge to 1:25, which requires more details of course!, and align several A0 horizontally.
Maybe you could align the plans horizontally, spread them over several connected A0 and unfold the elevations (north-west-south-east) and sections. In this could also be integrated the site plan (and details drawings), to start from a larger context to the details, controlling and visually representing the change of scale.
Perspective sections are greatly encouraged!!
Post a Comment